Burns Presents Superintendent's Case
Parham: 'Caged Bird' Is Age Appropriate and Good Literature Says Proper Procedures Were Followed

After Mrs. Taylor completed her testimony Thursday [August 27], an attorney representing Superintendent Carol Parham began presenting the case for including "I Know Why The Caged Bird Sings" in the county's ninth grade curriculum.

The tone of the hearing immediately changed, as attorney Darren Burns presented a wealth of evidence in an attempt to establish his three major points: (1) The book is well-written and has both literary merit and educational value; (2) The book is age appropriate for portions of the county's ninth grade students; and, (3) Proper procedures were followed in handling the Taylor's concerns about the book.

The Superintendent's first witness was Dr. James Foran, Director of Curriculum for the county. After presenting his credentials at length, Dr. Foran entered into evidence copies of the county's procedures for determining curriculum materials, and for handling parent complaints about those materials. He testified that proper procedures were followed in handling the Taylor's concern about the book.

Shelia Finalyson, a county English teacher with 25 years of teaching experience, testified about her use of the book in her ninth grade class at South River High School. [NOTE: Ms. Finalyson testified out of order, on Saturday, as a result of a scheduling conflict.]

Ms. Finalyson said that she had not received a single complaint from a student reading the book. She was "surprised" by, and "proud" of the mature way her students eagerly and enthusiastically discussed the book. She testified that it had great literary merit, and that by reading it, her students learned about grammar and vocabulary, as well as life lessons about relationships, families, and racism.

As the evening wore on, it became obvious that the hearing would have to be continued on a third date. Several school board members were irritated, saying that the evidence being presented by Mr. Burns was "irrelevant" to the case. Board member Dr. Florestino said that he did not need to come back and would not return for the final hearing session.

Despite the late evening fireworks, action on the Taylor's appeal was tabled. Closing arguments were scheduled for 6:00 PM Thursday, September 3.

Closing Arguments
Links to related material:


A Crofton Online Editorial

Reader Comments

Excerpts from "Caged Bird"

Analysis of the Taylor's Case

Analysis of the Superintendent's Case




Back to Crofton Online.