A Crofton Online Editorial
Crofton Meadows Board, Procom
Can't Shirk Responsibility

Procom's claim that a volunteer effort to rescue wildlife during the dredging of the Aberdeen Drive Duck Pond relieves it of responsibility rings hollow. Common sense dictates that the organization undertaking such an environmentally upsetting effort remains responsible for ensuring that all reasonable efforts are made to protect wildlife threatened by its actions.

Procom claims that volunteers agreed to rescue the animals; volunteers claim they stepped in only after Procom dropped the ball. Regardless, Procom remains morally and legally responsible for the results of the actions it takes.

Crofton Online watched the ducks swim in smaller and smaller circles as the water levels at the pond dropped. They did not just "fly away." These ducks were born here...


...and have become quite domesticated. Many of the rescued ducks became sick as the water turned into a mixture of sludge and garbage due to the dredging effort. Fish larger than two inches died as the mud clogged their gills and choked them; smaller fish gasped for air at the surface, creating thousands of tiny bubbles across the pond's surface.

Volunteers have put in multiple ten hour days attempting to round up as many of the ducks and other wildlife as possible. They should be applauded, not criticized.

We are also quite concerned about human safety during this process. Snapping turtles the size of hula hoops clearly visible in the sludge pose serious threats to children naturally attracted by the spectacle. Adults as well as children have sunk waist deep into the mire. A seven year old girl attempting to help rescue baby ducks quickly sank past her waist; fortunately a nearby adult was able to pull her to safety.

The pond remains easily accessible during the eight week dredging process. Procom and the Crofton Meadows Board have not fully fenced off the pond, or posted signs warning of the danger. We watched as adult volunteers departed at dusk. Many children remained at the water's edge, fishing, attempting to catch turtles with nets, or just watching (and smelling!) the mess. If an accident occurs, the homeowners who elect the Board and pay Procom will ultimately be held liable.

We agree that the dredging is necessary. The pond had become a safety hazard. Although volunteers can play a useful role in the efforts to protect wildlife, the organization performing the dredging cannot wash its hands of its ultimate responsibility for the actions it takes.


We welcome your response.

Back to Crofton Online